سلسلة الكتل (Blockchain)  والذكاء الاصطناعي في الأدلة الرقمية : التحديات القضائية ومعايير القبول

[1] الكتب

[2] [1] Mason, S., & Seng, D. (2021). Electronic Evidence and Electronic Signatures (5th ed.). London: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies / University of London Press. ISBN: 9781911507222.

[3] [2] Casey, E. (2011). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN: 9780123742681.

[4] [3] Mason, S. (2016). Electronic Signatures in Law (4th ed.). London: University of London Press. ISBN: 9781911507000.

[5] [4] Ashley, K. D. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107171503.

[6] المقالات العلمية

[7] [5] Wu, H. (2020). Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105401.

[8] [6] Liu, X., & Thompson, R. (2024). From smart legal contracts to contracts on blockchain. Computer Law & Security Review, 53, 105963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105963.

[9] [7] Kostopoulos, G., Davrazos, G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems: A recent review. Electronics, 13(14), 2842. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142842.

[10] التقارير الرسمية (in Arabic)

[11] [8] UAE Ministry of Justice. (2023). Guidelines for Smart Courts and e-Justice Services. Abu Dhabi: UAE Government. (in Arabic).

[12] [9] Egyptian Ministry of Communications & Ministry of Justice. (2022). National Strategy for Digital Transformation in Justice Sector 2022–2027. Cairo: Government of Egypt. (in Arabic).

[13] [10] UAE Digital Government. (2024). Smart Judiciary & Digital Justice Services – Guidance. Abu Dhabi: Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority. (in Arabic).

[14] المراجع الأجنبية

[15] الكتب

[16] [11] Antonopoulos, A. M. (2023). Mastering Bitcoin: Programming the Open Blockchain (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media. ISBN: 9781098150099.

[17] [12] Casey, M. J., & Vigna, P. (2018). The Truth Machine: The Blockchain and the Future of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ISBN: 9781250114570.

[18] [13] Goodman, M. (2015). Future Crimes: Inside the Digital Underground and the Battle for Our Connected World. New York: Doubleday. ISBN: 9780385539005.

[19] [14] Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. ISBN: 9780134610993.

[20] المقالات العلمية المحكمة

[21] [15] Wu, H. (2020). Electronic evidence in the blockchain era: New rules on authenticity and integrity. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105401.

[22] [16] Liu, X., & Thompson, R. (2024). From smart legal contracts to contracts on blockchain. Computer Law & Security Review, 53, 105963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.105963.

[23] [17] Kamarinou, D., Millard, C., & Singh, J. (2016). Machine learning with personal data. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 247/2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2865811.

[24] [18] Zhang, C., Xuan, H., Wu, T., Liu, X., Yang, G., & Zhu, L. (2024). Blockchain-based dynamic time-encapsulated data auditing for outsourcing storage. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19, 1979–1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2023.3338485.

[25] [19] Wright, J., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580664.

[26] [20] Da Silva, L., & de Araujo, A. D. (2024). Admissibility of smart contracts as legal evidence: A systematic review. Computer Law & Security Review, 54, 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040.

[27] [21] Richmond, K. M. G., Rehaag, S., & Waldman, L. (2024). Explainable AI and law: An evidential survey. AI and Ethics, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00081-z.

[28] [22] Ab Rahman, N. H., et al. (2022). Digital evidence: Investigation, validation, and its admissibility in court. Forensic Science International: Reports, 4, 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2021.100258.

[29] [23] Kuzuno, H., & Kiyomoto, S. (2018). Blockchain-based timestamping for digital evidence chain-of-custody. IEICE Transactions on Information & Systems, E101.D(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2017edp7264.

[30] [24] Davies, J., et al. (2024). Enhanced scalability and privacy for blockchain data using Merkle transaction trees. Frontiers in Blockchain, 6, 1222614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2023.1222614.

[31] السوابق القضائية

[32] [25] Court of Justice of the European Union. (2020). Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II), Case C-311/18. ECLI:EU:C:2020:559.

[33] [26] Hangzhou Internet Court (China). (2018, June 27). Huatai Yimei v. Daotong Technology (First judicial acceptance of blockchain-based evidence).

[34] [27] United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2017). (US case on digital evidence admissibility).

[35] [28] Supreme Court of Wisconsin. (2016). State v. Loomis, 2016 WI 68, 371 Wis. 2d 235, 881 N.W.2d 749.

[36] تقارير المنظمات الدولية

[37] [29] European Union. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Official Journal of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2861/701535.

[38] [30] European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2024). GDPR in practice – Experiences of data protection authorities. Vienna: FRA.

[39] [31] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). Electronic Evidence – Practitioner tools and training resources. Vienna: UNODC.

[40] [32] World Bank Group. (2022). Distributed Ledger Technology and Secured Transactions: Framework and Guidance Note. Washington, DC: World Bank.

[41] المعايير التقنية

[42] [33] International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO/IEC 27001:2022-Information security management systems-Requirements. Geneva: ISO.

[43] [34] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.29.

[44] [35] IEEE Standards Association. (2020). IEEE Standard for Blockchain — Smart Contracts (IEEE 2140.1-2020). New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9054804.

[45] المواقع والتقارير الإلكترونية

[46] [36] World Justice Project. (2021). Measuring the Justice Gap 2021. Washington, DC: WJP. https://worldjusticeproject.org.

[47] [37] Algorithmic Justice League. (2022). The State of AI Bias: A Report on Harms and Interventions. Boston, MA: AJL. https://www.ajl.org.

[48] [38] MIT Technology Review. (2023). Facial Recognition: The State of Bias Research. Cambridge, MA: MITTR. https://www.technologyreview.com.

[49] [39] Privacy International. (2023). Blockchain and Data Protection: A Global Overview. London: Privacy International. https://privacyinternational.org.

[50] المؤتمرات وورش العمل

[51] [40] European Blockchain Convention. (2024). Proceedings and Session Materials (Barcelona, Sept 2024). European Blockchain Institute. https://eblockchainconvention.com.

[52] [41] TechLaw. Fest (Singapore). (2024). AI in Legal Systems — Conference Sessions and Proceedings. Singapore Academy of Law. https://www.techlawfest.com.

[53] [42] Dubai Future Foundation & Dubai Courts. (2024). LegalTech Summit: Digital Transformation in Arab Courts. Dubai: Dubai Future Foundation. https://www.dubaifuture.ae